– 15 hour deadline – write 1000 word reflective essay – structure of the essay

– 15 hour deadline
– write 1000 word reflective essay
– structure of the essay and points you need to write about are in the rubrick file
– The essay is based on personal reflection of what was learned from the course (course structure and topics covered in course provided) and how acquired knowledge from the course will be applied in a future career (civil engineering)- You can cite few sources but most of the work must be from your own ideas and experiences
Assessment task 3: Reflective piece
Assessment type:Essay
Weighting
20%
Length
1000 words (+/- 10%)
The word count excludes the cover page, reference list, and any appendices that you may wish to include.
The targeted Program Learning Outcomes for this assessment are:

PLO 1 Explain their role as a local, national and global citizen and be able to apply these perspectives in business contexts.
PLO 4 Reflect on and continuously progress their own professional development, enhancing their intellectual agility and adaptability as tools for success in ever-changing business contexts.

Assignment
This assessment requires you to look back on your learning and experiences in this course and provide a personal reflection of what you learned from the course and how you have both used and will use this learning in the future. It allows you to take a bird’s eye view of the complete course and all the activities that you performed and derive meaning from the entire experience.
A reflection paper is a personal, sometimes anecdotal, or experiential reaction to a subject, but you may include citations as in any other paper. However, we are more interested to learn about your thoughts and experiences rather than those of other people, so keep citations to a minimum. If you refer to a work or use ideas from a work, then cite them in text and include a reference list at the end.
Essay Format and Suggestions

  • Your essay must be professionally presented using Arial or Calibri 12-point font, justified. Provide descriptive titles for different sections of your essay. Your essay must include an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion.
  • Your essay in its entirety should answer the following overarching question, clearly and specifically: how did the course experience broaden, deepen, or otherwise enrich your understanding of the discipline of innovation management, yourself, and/or the wider world?
  • Use a first-person narrative of your experience, highlighting key moments in the learning process. Tell the story of what you did and how, providing specific examples (e.g. reference to theories, frameworks, or tools covered in the course) to illustrate how your perspective/understanding evolved over the course of the semester.
  • Reflect on the significance of your experiences with respect to your professional and/or personal goals. How can you apply what you learned in the future? (as a civil engineer) In what situations?
  • List all scholarly and non-scholarly work you have used in the essay in a Reference List (but remember this is a reflective piece and most of the ideas should be your own).
  • The essay is to be written primarily for your own personal consumption and growth, but since it is a summative assessment it must be done in a way that your assessor will be able to judge the value of this exercise to you and the potential impact it will have on your future career.
  • Towards the beginning of the course you were asked to rate yourself on a variety of factors related to creativity and innovation skills and abilities. Now, after having completed this course, you have another opportunity to rate yourself again on the same factors and gauge whether you have made progress in each of the specified factors. You can use the insights gained from this activity in your personal reflection essay.
  • Aim to provide an honest and sincere reflection that demonstrates depth of thought, not simply a superficial exercise to get the job done. Don’t be tempted to write things that you believe your assessor might want to hear as that will be obvious as being insincere.
  • When writing your reflection, you should refrain from providing explanations of theory or providing definitions of concepts that were covered in this course. Rather, simply refer to these and reflect on the encounter and impact it had on you.
  • It is required that you apply the principles of D.I.E.P frameworkin your reflection.

 

  • The DIEP principles are:
D I E P
DESCRIBE
Objectively what you learnt
INTERPRET
The insight(in one or more paragraphs)
EVALUATE
What you have learnt
(in one or more paragraphs)
PLAN
How this learning will be applied in practice

This assessment will measure your ability to:

  • Introduce the context, background, scope and purpose of your essay (10 marks)
  • Provide a quality encounter of your learning (15 marks)
  • Reflect at a level that reveals deep insights (20 marks)
  • Evaluate the significance and impact of your learning (20 marks)
  • Implicate the significance of your learning to your future career (15 marks)
  • Draw a meaningful conclusion (10 marks)
  • Presentation (10 marks)

Rubric Template (2)

Rubric Template (2)
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcome Introduction
Introduces the topic in an interesting and appropriate manner. Defines the purpose, scope and structure of the essay.
10to >7.99Pts
HD
Excellent Introduction. Introduces the essay in an interesting way that clearly articulates the purpose, scope and structure of the essay.
7.99to >6.99Pts
DI
Well written Introduction and well stated purpose, scope and structure of the essay.
6.99to >5.99Pts
CR
Generally good Introduction of the topic and quite clearly stated purpose, scope and structure of the essay There is however, room for improvement.
5.99to >0.0Pts
PA
Some Introduction of the topic and some statement of the purpose, scope and structure of the essay but not clearly expressed.
0Pts
DNS
Inadequate or no Introduction provided. Has not clearly stated the purpose or the scope of the essay.
10pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcome Describe objectively what happened
Give the details of what happened. Answer the question: ‘What did I do, read, see, hear?’
15to >12.0Pts
HD
Outstanding description that succinctly summarises the semester’s encounters.
12to >10.5Pts
DI
Very good description of the semester’s encounters.
10.5to >9.0Pts
CR
Good description of the semester’s encounters but some important details are missing.
9to >0.0Pts
PA
Poor description of the semester’s encounters; several gaps apparent.
0Pts
DNS
No description pro

Buy plagiarism free, original and professional custom paper online now at a cheaper price. Submit your order proudly with us



Essay Hope