The dissenting opinion in Florida v. Jimeno stated, “Because an individual’s expectation

The dissenting opinion in Florida v. Jimeno stated, “Because an individual’s expectation of privacy in a container is distinct from, and far greater than, his expectation of privacy in the interior of his car, it follows that an individual’s consent to a search of the interior of his car cannot necessarily be understood as extending to containers in the car.” 500 U.S. at 254. Discuss.


Buy plagiarism free, original and professional custom paper online now at a cheaper price. Submit your order proudly with us



Essay Hope